It’s apparently patriotic to wear a mask under threat of statist violence but Democrats are the party that regularly condemn the notion of patriotism.
Technically, didn’t Biden find his way through grief by stealing another man’s wife?
Guess to Democrats, insurgents looting in the streets are about respect and dignity.
So are Biden’s BLM allies going to put in the hours of study needed for these “jobs of the 21st century” or is that acting “too White”?
Biden’s wife apparently “put their family back together” while their adultery tore her original marriage apart.
In his opposition to Russia, did Biden ever condemn the role played by the Soviets in selecting a young Barack?
Biden condemning the violence in Charlottesville three years ago. Ashame he has nothing to say about the violence erupting in America’s cities perpetrated by those whose ideology is not that appreciably different than the agenda endorsed by leading Democrats.
If Biden is so opposed to “systemic racism”, why did he enter the presidential campaign to begin with? Shouldn’t he have stepped aside in favor of minority candidates?
So deluded fanatics gather in a parking lot to watch on a screen the exact same oration that can be viewed on screen at home?
Weren’t the Democrats now insisting that it is patriotic to wear a mask without question at one time insisting that questioning the edicts of rulers represented the epitome of patriotism?
Got to love the commercials and news coverage that make you out to be some kind of subversive or mental defective if you are less than thrilled with the “new normal”.
Of course Biden isn’t going to say anything about China. You don’t bite the hand that feeds you or at least your dimwit child.
If it was safe enough to have fireworks at the Democratic convention, how come it’s apparently not safe to have the light pillar memorial for September 11th?
“Joe will bring us together.” Actually, there is next to nothing left to compromise over if this to remain a free nation.
“Joe will bring us together.” Ideological distancing is perhaps even more important than social distancing.
Science as defined by whom?
When he mentioned jobs, at least Biden did not proceed to spell it as a three letter word this time.
Too bad media not as concerned about preserving the Constitution and America’s foundational liberties as Jackie Kennedy's crab apples.
Pastor Robert Jeffres told Fox News that President Trump IS the Republican platform in that apparently the party has not published a traditional statement of belief in 2020. At this time, there is no other viable alternative to the anarchy and tyranny that would brutalize America under a Biden regime. However, I am rhetorically sorry, but if I would be appalled at such a verbal formulation especially coming out of the mouth of a pastor in regards to Barack Obama, I cannot endorse the concept of the führerprinzip in regards to Donald Trump. As a free individual, you ought to stand for an objectively stated set of beliefs, not unwavering fidelity to a mere human being who, while at the moment articulates a number of admirable policies, is clearly on the record of profoundly altering what he allegedly believes when doing so proves advantageous from a standpoint of existential utilitarianism. These are indeed sad times for America.
A commercial warns that, if you pay a babysitter more than $100 per week, you might owe nanny taxes. If that means per sitter, instead of paying one sitter $200, you’d be better off splitting between two sitters for $99.99 each.
A campaign advertisement for Senator Warner lamented Trump’s alleged threat to cut off funding for schools that do not comply with the President’s demand to open. But this administration cannot be blamed for developing such a hardline tactic. For when have federal funds never had strings attached? Why do schools not directly meeting the needs of students need funds in the first place?
NBA players and owners are forming a coalition to pursue social justice and racial equality. Does that include their exorbitant salaries being surrendered to be redistributed to those that have not achieved a similar level of accomplishment or who have barely even lifted a finger? Because social justice has very little to do with being an individual but rather about being part of a group.
Aren’t the ones concerned now about the negative things said about Bill Gates as the purveyor of compulsory vaccination propaganda and threats of punitive measures against those vowing not to submit to the policy preference of a mere private citizen the same ones that used to condemn him relentlessly for accumulating his wealth through making available reasonably accessible technology and over his less than rugged countenance?
In a sermon on the Creation Mandate, Pastor Sean Harris of Berean Baptist Church, where it is explicitly stated on the website that he himself has only one son and one granddaughter, remarked that usually those with large families go to small churches with other large families as they have often been shamed by side remarks and comments on the part of those with small families at large churches. Maybe those that have remained single as a result of any number of circumstances remain aloof from these churches with large families not only because of snide remarks about remaining single but because of the explicit equivocation in such environments of that relationship status with moral debauchery even when the targets of such derision have remained chaste by Biblical standards.
It might be a blessing for a family to have many children. However, it is the responsibility of that family and not everybody else to provide for these children.
The Baptists tossing the loudest fits about the unmarried are the same ones that get the most bent out of shape if one settles for someone outside a narrow band of churches in which there are barely any desirable singles to begin with.
So how is pointing out that the health of some will be irrevocably harmed as a result of the coronavirus vaccine a greater moral outrage than these pharmaceutical commercials that essentially say "Take this pill to prevent your hair turning gray. But by the way, one of the potential side effects is death by liver failure." At least with that medication you are given a choice without any potential of losing your job or freedom of movement for deciding not to take it. Apparently "science" no longer means the elucidation of all the facts irrespective of whether or not one likes them but rather the blind propagandistic endorsement of a predetermined policy and even religious agenda.
If there are riots over the nomination of the replacement of Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, that probably means Democratic Party bigwigs are likely behind the upheaval. Antifa and Black Lives canon fodder don’t seem bright enough to even name a Supreme Court justice.
The friendship between Ruth Bader Ginsberg and Antonin Scalia is being celebrated as ideal, even by conservatives. So apparently the lives of the unborn aren’t that big of a deal after all. Ginsberg was more than someone that might have had an abortion in the past. Rather she has been one of the procedure’s foremost advocates. So just how chummy should the town rabbi get with the grand wizard of the local chapter of the Klan?
If we are really going to view the unborn as actual human beings, given the accolades extended to Justice Ginsburg even by a variety of prominent conservatives does that mean that from now on that whenever a prominent terrorist passes all that can be said about them is a favorable assessment of their tactical prowess and media acumen?
Media tolerancemongers are apoplectic that President Trump complimented a primarily Caucasian crowd in Minnesota for their good genes. And how is that any worse than these minority propagandists such as Al Sharpton that have to constantly remind viewers with perfectly acceptable visual acuity what color or ethnic extraction that they happen to be?
Will public commemorations of Ruth Bader Ginsburg be condemned as Coronavirus superspreader events like the Sturgis motorcycle festival or Trump campaign rallies?
Frederick Meekins is an independent theologian and social critic. Frederick holds a BS in Political Science/History, a MA in Apologetics/Christian Philosophy from Trinity Theological Seminary, and a PhD. in Christian Apologetics from Newburgh Theological Seminary.
Cover
•
Commentary
•
Books & Reviews
•
Climate Change
•
Site Links
•
Feedback
