Topic category:  Other/General

Well, it is finally available to the public, fortunately in time for the public to avoid making the huge mistake of electing Hillary. By the directive of President Bill Clinton, Hillary's senior thesis was sealed; the only time this has ever been done in the history of Wellesley College. The reason it was hidden away? It reveals Hillary's Socialist/Communist philosophy and sympathies.

We've always known Hillary was a Socialist. But since her thesis has become public, she is no longer able to hide the depth of her radical views and the devastation a Hillary presidency would wreak on the American economy. Unable to undo the damage to the "moderate" image she has cultivated for the paste several decades, she is trying to turn this into a positive, by reaching out to the far left fringe of the Democrat party, all of whom have Socialist/Communist leanings.

For example, at a San Francisco fund-raiser, she promised to redistribute OUR money, Communist Style: "Many of you are well enough off that the tax cuts may have helped you," Sen. Clinton said. "We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." (See LINK below.)

My, that sounds strangely reminiscent of the philosophy of another great "leader," who proclaimed, "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need." Who was that? Oh, yes, Karl Marx, the great thinker who obviously made a great impression on Hillary's own philosophy. (See LINK below.)

Why would Billary put so much effort into concealing the thesis when thousands of researchers and journalists were searching for information on the newly elected First Couple? Why would they put pressure on Wellesley's President Nannerl Overholser Keohane (a large Democrat contributor and activist from Arkansas) to seal the thesis? The actual pronouncement from the President stated that all Senior Thesis were open to the public except for those written by Presidents and First Ladies, which were to be sealed. Coincidentally, Hillary's thesis was the only one ever to be sealed in Wellesley's history.

(Coincidentally, Keohane now claims that she doesn't remember sealing the thesis, but it was indeed sealed and unavailable to the public for 14 years. When an MSNBC reporter called her about the incident, she replied, "I have no memory of this," and hung up on him. MSNBC.com then e-mailed questions to her, and she replied, "I do not recall this situation, and cannot help you with this issue." Isn't it strange that she would have no memory of an incident involving such an unusual request from the President of the United States? Wellesley has confirmed that, contrary to her memory lapse, it was indeed Keohane who ordered that the thesis be sealed.)

The answer to these questions, of course, is that Hillary has long planned to be the first woman president, and the contents of the thesis would (and will) severely damage her chances of achieving that goal. Americans simply do not want a Socialist with strong Communist leanings taking money from some Americans and giving it to others (while, of course, keeping quite a bit of it for herself, as she did with her bogus futures trading and the Whitewater scandal). After the contents of her theses are widely distributed, she will have a lot better chance of taking Vladimir Putin's job than George Bush's.

Researcher Barbara Olsen, who has read the 75-page thesis, has done a masterful job of analyzing it. (See LINK below.) "The thesis is titled, "There is Only the Fight...An Analysis of the Alinsky Model." It exposes Hillary's strong identification with her mentor, Saul Alinsky, the man who had the strongest influence on the molding of her political thinking. Why else would she name her thesis after him?

Hillary compared Alinsky to Martin Luther King, humanist Walt Whitman, and Eugene Debs, a Socialist who ran five times for president. (Debs is distinguished by the fact that he is the only person who ever ran for president while in prison.)

When asked if he was a Communist, Alinsky replied, "Anybody who tells you he was active in progressive causes in those days and never worked with the Reds is a #@*&# liar. Their [the Communists'] platform stood for all the right things, and unlike many liberals, they were willing to put their bodies on the line."

Hillary made one true statement regarding Alinsky: "If the ideals Alinsky espouses were actualized, the result would be social revolution." Hillary entered Wellesley a Republican, but (at least in part) due to the influence of Alinsky, she became a radical Democrat. There is not much (if any) difference between radical Democrats and Communists, who have always worked toward "social revolution." Their version of "social revolution" always included putting the government in charge of virtually everything, one of Hillary's most cherished goals.

In her gushing praise of this Socialist/Communist radical, Hillary wrote: "His [Alinsky's] new aspect, national planning, derives from the necessity of entrusting social change to institutions, specifically the United States government." Marx, Lenin and Stalin would have been proud of her. That is exactly what they dreamed of: the government in charge of all aspects of life. (Of course, Lenin and Stalin would have changed the last phrase to " specifically, the government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics."

Friends, this has always been the goal of every Socialist and Communist government. They have always wanted to completely control the citizenry from the cradle to the grave. Marx and Engels proclaimed that if they had the children for the first six years of their lives, they would control them forever? In many cases the Russian government actually took the children from the parents and put them in boarding schools until they were thoroughly "indoctrinated." In fact, Khrushchev set a goal of having 2.5 Million Soviet children in boarding schools by 1965. Fortunately, that goal was not attained. (See LINK below.)

Hillary's version of this type of thinking is found in her book, "It Takes a Village." She doesn't want you to raise your child. She wants the government to control the thinking of your child in his or her formative years. That's why she is in favor of raising taxes. The higher the taxes, the more parents will be forced to put their children in government-controlled day care. America, it doesn't take a "village" to raise a child; it takes parents!

Billary claim that the reason they had the thesis sealed was that they wanted Hillary to work on health care reform (remember that great success?). They claimed that Hillary had been critical of Daniel Moynihan in the thesis, and that might hurt her chances of working with him on her plan to socialize US medicine. According to those who have read the entire thesis, this is simply another in a long, long list of Clinton lies. There was not one negative word about Moynihan in the thesis. The Clintons simply abused the Office of the President to suppress information that could potentially damage Hillary's chances of becoming the first Czar of America. (See LINK below, "How the Clintons Hid Hillary's Thesis.")

As recently as June 4, 2007, Hillary was espousing her Socialist/Communist philosophies in speeches. "We reject the idea of an on your own' society." Translation: We will crush entrepreneurs (who are the backbone of the tremendous success of the US economy). "We believe in shared responsibility for shared prosperity." Translation: We will take money from those who work hard and give it to people who refuse to work, but who vote Democrat.

More Socialist/Communist rhetoric has been evident in her speeches since her thesis was outed. (I assume she feels she has nothing to lose by showing her true feelings, since the thesis has made them public.) She has referred to the lat six years as the "Robber-Baron Years" (a reference to a time when the rich got richer, and the poor got poorer) This despite the fact that the economy has been growing at a tremendous rate due to Bush's tax cuts (which Hillary has promised to repeal); the unemployment rate is low; and the stock market has made huge gains.

The hypocrisy of these statements is phenomenal. She states that only the rich benefit from the stock market. The fact is that 52% of Americans own stocks, and that number is growing every year. (In 1990, only 21% of Americans owned stock.) The middle class is growing, as census figures demonstrate. And even the poorest American is rich by world standards. 99% of Americans own television sets, including those on welfare. If they were starving, as the Hypocrite-in-Chief claims, would they be spending money on television sets? Another bright spot that Hillary ignores: 70% of American families own the homes they live in, up 5% in the last six years. Hillary knows that the only way she can be elected is to make Americans believe the lie that we are in terrible shape, and that she is the only one who can save us.

Hillary has said that her thesis allows readers to decipher her true thinking. I predict that (even though the Clintons threatened to sue one man who tried to post it) the thesis will soon be available on the Internet in its entirety. Read it. My advice: don't read it just before you go to bed, or you will have nightmares.

Dr. Tom Barrett
Conservative Truth (Publisher, Editor)