Commentaries, Global Warming, Opinions   Cover   •   Commentary   •   Books & Reviews   •   Climate Change   •   Site Links   •   Feedback
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." - John 8:32
WEBCommentary Contributor
Author:  Jim Wrenn
Bio: Jim Wrenn
Date:  August 19, 2006
Print article - Printer friendly version

Email article link to friend(s) - Email a link to this article to friends

Facebook - Facebook

Topic category:  Other/General

Connecting dots reveals strategies of IFAPS alliance among al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hammas, Islamic Jihad, Iran, Syria, North Korea, and Venezuela.

Numerous dots are emerging, connection of which form extremely disturbing pictures about the Islamo-Fascist And Paleo-Stalinist Alliance. [Footnote-A] What are the pictures and what are the strategies to counter their disturbing implications?

01. During the six years since Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon, Hezbollah (acting with the direct aid of Syria and Iran and the indirect aid of Russia and China): (a) amassed a huge arsenal of highly sophisticated anti-tank weapons, massive stockpiles of short-range rockets, large stockpiles of longer-range rockets, significant stockpiles of short-range missiles, and a supply of drone aircraft and anti-ship missiles; (b) created huge underground bunker/tunnel networks hidden within civilian areas; and (c) received from Iran extensive military training not only in defensive strategies by also in offensive strategies and special operations.

02. Syria unwittingly sparked the "Cedar Revolution" by its complicity in the assassination of the anti-Syrian, pro-democratic former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, after which even the United Nations had the temerity to implicate Syria in such assassination.

03. The United Nations adopted a resolution for Syria to withdraw from Lebanon and for non-Lebanese-Army forces in Lebanon to be disarmed (U.N. Resolution 1559).

04. The United Nations and the Lebanese Government failed to enforce, and Syria, Iran and Hezbollah defied, the UN resolution for disarmament of non-Lebanese-Army forces in Lebanon.

05. Iran's fanatically fundamentalist, Islamo-Totalitarian President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has repeatedly been asserting (a) that the Holocaust is a "myth" and (b) (as an article of Islamic faith) that Muslims have a religious duty to eradicate the state of Israel.

06. Hezbollah's leader in Lebanon, Hassan Nasrallah, has repeatedly asserted that all "Jews" in the world opposing the destruction of Israel should move to Israel to save followers of his fanatically totalitarian version of Islam the "trouble" of having to go all over the world to find and "kill" them.

07. Ignoring such fanaticism, American and European leftists have lauded the "social services" skills of Hezbollah and characterized Israel as though it were Nazi Germany. (Would they laud the peacefulness that may typically exist in neighborhoods populated by organized-crime bosses who conspicuously support popular charities? Perhaps many of such American/European leftists secretly agree with the anti-Jewish-bigotry recently expressed by Mel Gibson [Footnote-B] in a drunken stupor and by former Atlanta mayor Andrew Young [Footnote-B] in an ostensible state of sobriety.)

08. During the latest phase of Iran's ongoing confrontation with the hand-tied United Nations over Iran's nuclear program, Hezbollah committed the unprovoked acts of war against Israel (e.g., crossing from southern Lebanon into Israel, killing eight Israeli soldiers and taking two Israeli soldiers hostage) which prompted Israel's military response against Hezbollah in Lebanon. While there may be doubt about whether Hezbollah and/or Syria and/or Iran expected the scope of Israel's response, there can be little doubt that Hezbollah didn't commit the initiating acts of war without tacit approval, if not instructions, from Iran and/or Syria. However, given what in hindsight appear to have been deficiencies in Israeli intelligence about the scope and sophistication of Hezbollah armaments (such as Russian anti-tank missiles and even some old U.S. TOW missiles), it is more than reasonable to infer that Iran/Syria/Hezbollah actually intended for such attack to provoke a large-scale response with the hope of luring large numbers of Israeli tanks into southern Lebanon to be destroyed in large numbers by state-of-the-art Russian anti-tank missiles. If the latter inference were to be correct, then Israel's refusal to launch a full-scale armored invasion constituted the strategic lesser of two evils which at least buys time for Israel to develop effective counter measures.

09. Iranian President Ahmadinejad's setting "August 22, 2006" as the date on which Iran will "respond" to the current United Nations resolution demanding cessation of Iran's nuclear-fuel enrichment program-- coupled with the medieval, mythical nature of his fanatically fundamentalist Islamic "faith"-- has spawned widespread speculation about whether Iran planned to surprise the world with an underground nuclear blast on that date and also sponsor a Hezbollah incursion into northern Israel. If the latter inference were to be correct, then it is more likely that neither Hezbollah nor Iran expected the Hezbollah attack into Israel to prompt an Israeli response during which Israel would discover what it hadn't learned (i.e., Hezbollah's possession of the Russian anti-tank missiles), in which case Israel's military response (generally deemed by the world to have strengthened rather than weakened Hezbollah's hold on the minds of many Lebanese) may well have exposed part of the Iranian/Syrian/Hezbollah strategic goal of coordinating a debut of Iran's nuclear "power" with a Hezbollah incursion into northern Israel to inflict heavy losses on Israeli armor and at least temporarily "hold" Israeli territory with Iran's newly-demonstrated nuclear-power "status" being invoked in an attempt to deter Israel from repelling Hezbollah.

10. Regardless of whether inference 08 or 09 were to be correct, it's more than reasonable to expect Iran's "response" on August 22, 2006, to be an underground nuclear blast to debut it's entry into the "nuclear club." (Never mind that many experts claim Iran is "years away" from such accomplishment-- the same was thought by western intelligence about India before it successfully detonated its first nuclear bomb and likewise with respect to China and Pakistan.) According to experts on extremely fundamentalist Islamic beliefs, August 22, 2006 on the Gregorian Calendar corresponds to the date on the Islamic calendar for which there is a "prophecy" about Jerusalem being delivered from infidels in a mighty cataclysm-- see Footnote-C.

11. Meanwhile, as we observe an uneasy "ceasefire" between Israel and Hezbollah pursuant to U.N. Resolution No. 1701 made even more uneasy by typical French backstabbing and renegging on prior commitments, activities in North Korea designed to at least create the appearance of preparation, if not actual preparation, for detonating an underground nuclear blast make it clearly reasonable to infer that North Korea is coordinating such activity between now (August 19, 2006) and August 22, 2006 with Iran. Remember, they both share the view that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend," and they both consider the West generally and the United States in particular their "enemy."

12. We should hope that Bush has an effective contingency plan if event "10" and/or "11" were to occur-- i.e., having at the ready a coordinated air-attack campaign designed to use massive air assaults on Iran's nuclear assets (and/or North Korea's nuclear assets) within no less than several hours after any such underground blast. Large numbers of daisy cutters guided into very deep craters from numerous, sequential blasts from satellite-guided bunker-busters ought to give ample opportunity to the majority of Iranians eager to escape from under the totalitarian boots of the fanatical mullahs to seize control of their country from the medieval mullahs and bring Iran into modernity.

13. Would such military response by the U.S. (and, one would hope, at least a few allies) "inflame" the anti-western, anti-liberty, Jew-hating, totalitarian Islamic fanatics and paleo-Stalinists? Of course. Would we face "increased" risks of terrorism? Probably in the short run, but to permit Iran's fanatical, medieval mullah's and/or North Korea's psychologically unbalanced leader to possess nuclear weapons would pose an almost infinitely greater danger in the long run.

Jim Wrenn

(Jim Wrenn is Editor at WrennCom.Com and Editor at PoliSat.Com)

Footnote-A. Regarding the "Islamo-Fascist And Paleo-Stalinist Alliance" see [http://wrenncom.com/CommentaryArchives/2006/20y06m05d03-01.asp] and [http://PoliSat.Com/CITGO.htm]

Footnote-B. Regarding Mel Gibson, see http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2006-07-31-gibson-remarks-police_x.htm. Regarding Andrew Young, see http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/18/AR2006081800673_pf.html.

Footnote-C. See http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=23533. See also Bernard Lewis' August 8, 2006, column in the Wall Street Journal at http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008768. For more links, perform a Google "advanced search" search [http://news.google.com/advanced_news_search?hl=en&ned=us] for the exact phrase "August 22, 2006" with "Ahmadinejad" in the "must have" box.

Permanent link to this Commentary: [http://WrennCom.Com/CommentaryArchives/2006/20y06m08d19-01.asp].

Jim Wrenn
Political Satire/Commentary at PoliSat.Com (Editor)

Send email feedback to Jim Wrenn


Biography - Jim Wrenn

Jim is a proud descendant of 18th Century criminal exiles from England who swam to the Outer Banks when the British ship taking them to a Georgia penal colony sank in a storm near Cape Hatteras. Having the prescience to prevent their descendants from becoming "TarHeels," they immediately migrated to Virginia, where, within just a few generations they worked their way up into poverty. Jim's grandfather was the first in the family tree to see the distant horizons, but his career was cut short by severe injuries he sustained when a cousin cut down the tree.

After a brief stint in the Amry (ours) following graduation from law school, he began his legal career in the state bureaucracy but was never able to break into the federal bureaucracy. Several years later, he entered the private practice of law and co-founded a small law publishing company. Later, finding the publishing of small laws unstimulating and finding his private practice too private to be lucrative, he began writing political satire/commentary. His greatest vice is taking himself too seriously.

He wrote the definitive books on the Clinton Era Error: the Clinton Liebrary Book (pre-October, 2000), which he later updated as the Clinton Liebrary Book 2001 Edition to include Election 2000, the post-election shennanigans, and related events through August, 2001. The 2001 edition is the only known literary source that conclusively shows why Bill Clinton pardoned Susan McDougal but not Webster Hubbel. It also presciently contains the Billary/Hillary Dueling Memoirs. At every opportunity he shamelessly promotes his books for orders on-line or by fax at www.ClintonLiebraryBook.Com. He's also the Librarian at the Clinton Liebrary (www.ClintonLiebrary.Com), which owns exclusive rights to Bill Clinton's most famous speech as well as Bill Clinton's comments after revelation of the identity of Deep Throat in 2005.

As an amateur scientist as well as a scientific amateur, he de-bunks the man-is-causing-Global "Warming" theory, and predicts that by the middle of the 21st Century (when he will be safely dead) physicists will discover the obvious flaws in Einstein's Theory of Relativity, which will lead to vastly-faster-than-light travel through polarization of gravity. As a constitutional-law scholar, he's trying to teach those who hold a static, zero-sum-game view of economic and social theories to understand that "property" is not a "thing" but rather is a human right.

Although he regularly teaches Continuing Legal Education courses to lawyers, he's too-often available through he Rubber Chicken Speakers Bureau to speak on politics, satire, etc., at luncheons, dinners, root canals, funerals, etc. His speaking fees are so outrageously high they border on criminal price-gouging, but as a free-market advocate, he defends his fees on the higher moral ground of charging whatever the traffic will bear. For more information (surely more than one would want or need), go to www.PoliSat.Com.


Read other commentaries by Jim Wrenn.

Visit Jim Wrenn's website at Political Satire/Commentary at PoliSat.Com

Copyright 2006 by Jim Wrenn
All Rights Reserved.

[ Back ]


© 2004-2017 by WEBCommentary(tm), All Rights Reserved