Abusing Impeachment Abusing our Constitution's impeachment process
In a transparent attempt to influence the 2020 election, crazed House Democrats passed articles of impeachment based on their own fantasies and a projection of their own criminal activities. They unwittingly expose their own corruption.
Democrat “prosecutors” — almost exclusively Rep. Adam Schiff — have finished presenting the House’s non-case for impeachment.
They presented no facts, no evidence, and no defined crime. Instead, they engaged in prolonged rhetorical sophistry laced with unsupportable allegations and accusations of fantasized crimes that never occurred.
Other than boring Senators into a stupor, exactly what have they accomplished?
They’ve managed to create a piñata stuffed with the fantasies of teary-eyed Hillary Clinton supporters who have yet to come to grips with the fact that their thoroughly corrupt candidate for president was trounced by Donald J. Trump in November 2016.
Among the “goodies” stuffed into that piñata are three years of losers’ angst spiced with a visceral hatred born of the frustration of having neither the evidence to support impeachment nor the maturity to deal with the rejection of their candidate.
Corrupt Democrat politicians and their friendly agents in the Democrat Ministry of Propaganda (often mischaracterized as “the press”) have gone from one fantasy to another, desperately trying to spin a tale that willing dupes will swallow despite the absence of any corroborating evidence.
To complete their illusion, House prosecutors have wrapped their piñata with a tapestry of solemnly delivered, yet obscenely inappropriate appeals to decency, morality, honesty, and “the American way”!
But now the President’s defense presents their case.
Expect that piñata to be blown open with the initial blows of truth that slice through the thin veneer of “solemn appeals” while spilling the bizarre fantasies of the deluded to the ground as rats that, fearing exposure, quickly scurry into dark corners.
The light of truth will expose and eviscerate the banal rhetoric of prosecutors desperately presenting a non-case unsupported by either evidence or facts.
If nothing else, this sorry episode in the ongoing disintegration of the Democrat Party will serve as an example of the penalty exacted on those who corruptly abuse our Constitution in a desperate attempt to unseat a duly-elected president on the basis of nothing more than a projection of their own motives and crimes.
Author of "Looking Out the Window", an evidence-based examination of the "climate change" issue, Bob Webster, is a 12th-generation descendent of both the Darte family (Connecticut, 1630s) and the Webster family (Massachusetts, 1630s). He is a descendant of Daniel Webster's father, Revolutionary War patriot Ebenezer Webster, who served with General Washington. Bob has always had a strong interest in early American history, our Constitution, U.S. politics, and law. Politically he is a constitutional republican with objectivist and libertarian roots. He has faith in the ultimate triumph of truth and reason over deception and emotion. He is a strong believer in our Constitution as written and views the abandonment of constitutional restraint by the regressive Progressive movement as a great danger to our Republic. His favorite novel is Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand and believes it should be required reading for all high school students so they can appreciate the cost of tolerating the growth of unconstitutional crushingly powerful central government. He strongly believes, as our Constitution enshrines, that the interests of the individual should be held superior to the interests of the state.
A lifelong interest in meteorology and climatology spurred his strong interest in science. Bob earned his degree in Mathematics at Virginia Tech, graduating in 1964.