Using the power of the Department of Justice and local campaigns to pressure anyone who supports efforts to reduce vote fraud, Democrats are using the full array of their political power to increase the likelihood of massive vote fraud during national elections this November.
Using the power of the Department of Justice (DoJ) and local campaigns to pressure anyone who supports efforts to reduce vote fraud, Democrats are using the full array of their political power to increase the likelihood of massive vote fraud during national elections this November.
Essentially, the Democrat Party is admitting that it relies on vote fraud for a significant portion of its success at the polls. Otherwise, why would they go to such extremes to overturn new state laws designed to substantially reduce vote fraud? Using every trick in the book, from DoJ actions to State and local pressure, Democrats have taken their campaign to the courts where they often find a friendly partisan judge to thwart the application of new voter identification laws that have been passed throughout the country.
This series of suits by the DoJ to overturn new State voter identification laws has been an initial thrust of the Obama re-election campaign. Knowing full well that vote fraud is essential if he is to have any chance for re-election during this economic, energy, foreign policy, and financial disaster that has marked his presidency, Obama's DoJ is doing everything it can to strike down new state laws that would all but eliminate vote fraud.
In order to divert focus from their real intent to continue their usual pattern of vote fraud, Democrats use the strategy of making false claims that voter identification amounts to "Jim Crow" laws. Such claims are absurd on their face. All any citizen need do is use any legitimate photo identification or, if lacking one, simply go to a motor vehicle agency and obtain one at no cost. Are Democrats claiming their constituents are either too lazy or too stupid to make an effort to obtain legitimate identification? Such people should not be voting in the first place regardless of which party they might support.
Evidently, Democrats think it just fine that a photo-identification is needed for airport security, but none should be required to cast a vote! How, pray tell, do Democrats expect vote officials to control fraud if they cannot positively identify real citizens from those who have no right to vote? Oh wait, that's right, they don't.
We see in this strategy yet another reason Democrats have so furiously opposed border control and policies designed to minimize the illegal alien presence in our country. Sure, let's just open the doors to a non-citizens and terrorists flooding across the Mexican border -- all in support of Democrat vote fraud! And, yes, let's require political correctness and demand they be called "undocumented workers" regardless of whether they have any intent to work!
Now it appears that the national campaign to pave the way for vote fraud is being joined by some large corporations, apparently fearful that they might lose a few customers who buy into the Democrat campaign for vote fraud. Coca-Cola (Coke) quickly caved by pulling its support for a pro-voter identification group supporting the campaign to eliminate vote fraud. Wal-Mart has also been approached to withdraw their support for legitimate voter identification laws.
It is time for those who cherish our constitutional republic to take a stand. Pressure Coke to reverse it's stance and continue its support for efforts to reduce voter fraud. Tell Wal-Mart they had better not stop their support to eliminate voter fraud. Write letters to the editor to expose the massive war Democrats are waging against our election process for the sole reason that vote fraud always helps Democrats more than any other political group.
One final thought. Parents of public school children must speak with their children on a daily basis about what they are being taught in school about politics, current events, and the "green" movement. Don't allow union teachers to propagandize your children. It is up to you to assure they learn about the roots of our nation from the Mayflower Compact and Declaration of Independence through our Constitution. It is rare that students are exposed to real US history and even more rare that they receive a proper education about the true nature of our constitutionally-limited federal government. Lacking a proper knowledge of these, no student will be equipped to become a good citizen with a sound basis for making good voting decisions.
Don't let the Democrat campaign for vote fraud succeed. Do what you can to support legitimate voter identification laws. Protect the sanctity of your vote.
After all, do you want to allow a non-citizen or a citizen who registers multiple times under different names to cancel your vote?
Bob Webster, a 12th-generation descendent of both the Darte family (Connecticut, 1630s) and the Webster family (Massachusetts, 1630s) is a descendant of Daniel Webster's father, Revolutionary War patriot Ebenezer Webster, who served with General Washington. Bob has always had a strong interest in early American history, our Constitution, U.S. politics, and law. Politically he is a constitutional republican with objectivist and libertarian roots. He has faith in the ultimate triumph of truth and reason over deception and emotion. He is a strong believer in our Constitution as written and views the abandonment of constitutional restraint by the regressive Progressive movement as a great danger to our Republic. His favorite novel is Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand and believes it should be required reading for all high school students so they can appreciate the cost of tolerating the growth of unconstitutional crushingly powerful central government. He strongly believes, as our Constitution enshrines, that the interests of the individual should be held superior to the interests of the state.
A lifelong interest in meteorology and climatology spurred his strong interest in science. Bob earned his degree in Mathematics at Virginia Tech, graduating in 1964.