Because God in Christ worked out the plan of salvation in a particular moment of time, I donít see how it follows that the true Christian is obligated to have a lifelong love of history to the point where you read the discipline regularly.
Isnít that akin to saying that if you donít possess a physicianís or nurseís level of knowledge of anatomy that you donít appreciate the body as the temple of the Holy Spirit?
Everybodyís got different things they are interested in.
It is commendable to have a knowledge of church history.
But I don't see the point of laying on a guilt trip on those that really aren't into the topic as an avocation or hobby.
Should the bookworms not that great at math beyond balancing a checkbook be condemned for not being skilled in what is often described as the language in which God wrote the universe into existence?
It is commendable to have an understanding and appreciation for church history.
However, if one becomes to absorbed in the discipline, isn't there a danger of keeping stoked to too intense a degree ancient disputes of long ago?
Just how worked up should the believer still be over the Defenestration of Prague?
Frederick Meekins is an independent theologian and social critic. Frederick holds a BS in Political Science/History, a MA in Apologetics/Christian Philosophy from Trinity Theological Seminary, and a PhD. in Christian Apologetics from Newburgh Theological Seminary.