Topic category: Elections - Politics, Polling, etc.
Cardinal Dolan Should Look to Father Pavone for Wisdom and Strength
ďThere comes a time when enough is enough and we can no longer afford to give people a reason to doubt our position as a Church."
President Barack Obama must have been delighted to accept the invitation of Cardinal Timothy Dolan, Archbishop of New York and president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, to address the Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner, an annual fundraiser for New York Catholic Charities to be held on October 18 this year.
"There is a controversy brewing in Catholic and pro-life circles over reports that the President has been invited to attend the annual Al Smith Dinner here in New York. In my opinion, people need to take a deep breath, relax a second, and think carefully about this.
"Itís important first to understand what the Al Smith Dinner is, and is not, and then what the invitation means, and what it does not.
"The Al Smith Dinner is organized and hosted by the Alfred E. Smith Foundation, which is closely affiliated with but independent of the Archdiocese of New York. Itís named after Governor Al Smith, an iconic figure in New York politics, who dedicated his life to serving the people of the state, particularly the needy. He was a classic urban machine politician, but was also committed to working with others across party lines when he saw that it was in the public interest. He was always proud of his Catholic faith and he defended the Church against attacks against religious bigotry. He was certainly well familiar with anti-Catholicism, since his own faith was brutally attacked during his run for the Presidency in 1928.
"The dinner is not a religious event in any way ó itís a civic/political event that raises money for Catholic charitable institutions. Itís not held at a religious building ó itís at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel. It has no religious component aside from a benediction and closing prayer ó much like sessions of Congress. A large proportion of the people who attend the Dinner are not Catholic, and the list of past speakers shows that only once in its almost 70-year history has a religious figure given the keynote address (Cardinal OíConnor).
"The dinner has a long tradition of inviting New York elected officials of all parties, and candidates of both major parties for the Presidency. It is strictly non-partisan, and an invitation to the dinner is in no way an endorsement of any office holder, or any candidate for office.
"Itís also important that the politicians who speak at the dinner are not being given any honor or award by the Church, but are rather delivering an address that is one part jocular remarks written by professional jokesters, and two-parts generic political after-dinner bromides. Any comparison between the Al Smith Dinner and the honorary degree given to the President at Notre Dameís graduation ceremony is thus completely off-the-mark.
"Everybody at the dinner understands this ó itís a civic event, much like a Veteranís Day parade (but with a fancier menu and white tie).
"Some people have been saying that inviting the President in some way undermines or contradicts the Churchís public witness in defense of life and the family. There is no question that the Presidentís political agenda and policy record are deplorable from a Catholic perspective ó he is consistently anti-life and is ardent in his promotion and support of abortion, he is in favor of re-defining marriage, he opposes parental choice in education, his Administration is a consistent enemy of religious freedom, and there is good reason to believe that he has dealt with our bishops in less than good faith.
"Give the consistency and strength with which our bishops ó particularly Cardinal Dolan ó have been proclaiming the Catholic view of public policy, it is hard to see how this one Dinner could possibly lead anyone to believe that the Church is softening her defense of life, the family, and religious liberty. When everyone wakes up the morning after, the struggle will resume.
"But, as a matter of fact, an invitation to the current incumbent President to the Al Smith Dinner actually sends a message, one that is important in this time of pathologically toxic politics. It says to us that we can vehemently disagree with a public officialís positions, but we can still show respect for his office, and for him as a person, and treat him with civility. It gives us an opportunity to act as Christians, and show some love to our adversaries, and even those whose policies we consider to be immoral and oppressive. After all, even St. Peter told us to 'honor the emperor' (1 Pet 2:17).
"The message is also that we can set aside our deeply-held differences and leave the partisan politics at the door for an evening, speak nicely and politely to each other, and work together for a common cause in the service of the poor. Thatís a good thing, something that Al Smith would have been proud to associate himself with, and something that Catholics and pro-lifers should also support."
Father Frank Pavone, the head of Priests for Life, boldly (and rightly) rejected the "honor the emperor" nonsense and acknowledged that the invitation to President Obama was not justified.
ďIím all in favor of protocol and understand the difference between respecting the Presidentís policies vs. respecting his office,Ē Father Pavone said.ĒBut there comes a time when the polite putting aside of differences for a while amounts to scandal.Ē
ďThere comes a time when enough is enough and we can no longer afford to give people a reason to doubt our position as a Church. On August 1, the unjust HHS mandate went into effect for Priests for Life and millions of other Americans, and I announced to our staff that we are disobeying the mandate,Ē Pavone said in comments to LifeNews. ďSo no, I donít think the invitation is appropriate at this time.Ē
The invitation was not merely inappropriate, it was shameful.
Michael J. Gaynor has been practicing law in New York since 1973. A former partner at Fulton, Duncombe & Rowe and Gaynor & Bass, he is a solo practitioner admitted to practice in New York state and federal courts and an Association of the Bar of the City of New York member.
Gaynor graduated magna cum laude, with Honors in Social Science, from Hofstra University's New College, and received his J.D. degree from St. John's Law School, where he won the American Jurisprudence Award in Evidence and served as an editor of the Law Review and the St. Thomas More Institute for Legal Research. He wrote on the Pentagon Papers case for the Review and obscenity law for The Catholic Lawyer and edited the Law Review's commentary on significant developments in New York law.
The day after graduating, Gaynor joined the Fulton firm, where he focused on litigation and corporate law. In 1997 Gaynor and Emily Bass formed Gaynor & Bass and then conducted a general legal practice, emphasizing litigation, and represented corporations, individuals and a New York City labor union. Notably, Gaynor & Bass prevailed in the Second Circuit in a seminal copyright infringement case, Tasini v. New York Times, against newspaper and magazine publishers and Lexis-Nexis. The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed, 7 to 2, holding that the copyrights of freelance writers had been infringed when their work was put online without permission or compensation.
Gaynor currently contributes regularly to www.MichNews.com, www.RenewAmerica.com, www.WebCommentary.com, www.PostChronicle.com and www.therealitycheck.org and has contributed to many other websites. He has written extensively on political and religious issues, notably the Terry Schiavo case, the Duke "no rape" case, ACORN and canon law, and appeared as a guest on television and radio. He was acknowledged in Until Proven Innocent, by Stuart Taylor and KC Johnson, and Culture of Corruption, by Michelle Malkin. He appeared on "Your World With Cavuto" to promote an eBay boycott that he initiated and "The World Over With Raymond Arroyo" (EWTN) to discuss the legal implications of the Schiavo case. On October 22, 2008, Gaynor was the first to report that The New York Times had killed an Obama/ACORN expose on which a Times reporter had been working with ACORN whistleblower Anita MonCrief.