Commentaries, Global Warming, Opinions   Cover   •   Commentary   •   Books & Reviews   •   Climate Change   •   Site Links   •   Feedback
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." - John 8:32
WEBCommentary Contributor
Author:  Michael J. Gaynor
Bio: Michael J. Gaynor
Date:  June 13, 2011
Print article - Printer friendly version

Email article link to friend(s) - Email a link to this article to friends

Facebook - Facebook

Topic category:  Government/Politics

Obama's Beatable, IF Republicans and Tea Partiers Are United AND Expose Obama Lies

For Obama, the facts are damning: he was ACORN's man, he lied about his relationship with ACORN and the liberal media establishment covered up/ignored the illicit relationship between ACORN/Project Vote and the Obama presidential campaign.

Exposing the lies of a Far Left Democrat politician is effective. Just as Congressman Anthony Weiner. His fellow Democrats want him to disappear, because his status as a liar is crystal clear.

Conservatives meed to make it crystal clear that other Far Left Democrats have shamelessly ;ied too. If they do, stealth socialist progress will be through.

Thanks to the Tea Partiers, Republicans won control of the House of Representatives and made important gains in the United States Senate as well as other elections in 2010.

The Tea Partiers made the difference between winning and losing and they are principled people with traditional American values who cannot be taken for granted.

The Republican Establishment must not forget that.

The victory could have been even bigger if Republicans and Tea Partiers had been more united, and realistic.

Republicans and Tea Partiers must appreciate that.

America remains a center-right country, but President Barack Obama set out to "fundamentally transform" it.

We and future generations will pay the price of his desire to "spread the wealth" via deficit spending and send the cost of energy through the roof.

Republicans and Tea Partiers have a common interest in limiting the damage.

The rookie United States Senator with no executive experience before he became President fooled the voters in 2008 and then push a radical agenda as hard as he could.

As then Democrat presidential candidate Obama told plumber Joe Wurzelbacher in the fall of 2008:

"My attitude is that if the economyís good for folks from the bottom up, itís gonna be good for everybody. If youíve got a plumbing business, youíre gonna be better off if youíre gonna be better off if youíve got a whole bunch of customers who can afford to hire you, and right now everybodyís so pinched that business is bad for everybody and I think when you spread the wealth around, itís good for everybody."

Obama's been spreading borrowed wealth around and, unsurprisingly, his economic program has been a terrible failure.

The unemployment rate illustrates that.

Instead of dealing with America's spending problem, Obama exacerbated it. He pursued a big government stealth socialist agenda designed to insure not only his reelection, but also perpetual election of Leftist Democrats by a dependent majority class.

If the 2012 presidential election was a yes or no referendum on President Obama. he'd be a one-term president.

But it will be an election, not a referendum, and nominating a suitable alternative is a great challenge to the Republican Party.

If the Republican Party nominates a candidate who is unacceptable to the Tea Party, the likelihood is that Obama will win with a plurality of the popular vote and a majority of the electoral vote.

That would be a catastrophe worse than the conveniently timed financial crisis traceable to the Cloward-Piven strategy, ACORN, SEIU, the Community Reinvestment Act and Congressional Democrats blocking supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that put Obama in the White House.

Character is critical, especially for a President, and Obama's bad character needs to be exposed instead of ignored.

Obama cleverly conned his way into the White House by concealing his radicalness.

Norman Thomas (1884-1968), six time Socialist Party candidate for President of the United States, declared in a speech in 1944: "The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." He explained that he "no longer need[ed] to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party" because "[t]he Democratic Party has adopted our platform."

People like Wade Rathke, founder of ACORN and Sonia Sotomayor, the La Raza board member who became Obama's first United States Supreme Court appointee, know that word choice matters and packaging counts.

For Obama, the facts are damning: he was ACORN's man, he lied about his relationship with ACORN and the liberal media establishment covered up/ignored the illicit relationship between ACORN/Project Vote and the Obama presidential campaign.

In February 2010 Glenn Beck highlighted Obama's ACORN ties and lies about them (www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/36789/):

GLENN: So we have the audio of him and weíll play it for you in a second. And then he was on with George Stephanopoulos and he you know, George Stephanopoulos said, you know, whatís the deal with ACORN? Are you aware of this? And he said, I donít pay any attention to that stuff. Now we have some video of the president of the United States, verification of one of the most blatant lies Iíve ever seen where he looks right into the camera and tells you, "I was just, I did some attorney work for them, thatís it." This now is apparently video from during the campaign where he was meeting with who we assume were ACORN officials because heís referring to ACORN as "You," and hereís how he describes his relationship with ACORN.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: And I definitely welcome ACORNís input. You donít have to ask me about that. Iím going to call you even if you didnít ask me.

When I ran Project Vote, voter registration drive in Illinois, you know, ACORN was smack dab in the middle of it. Once I was elected, there wasnít a campaign that ACORN worked on down in Springfield that I wasnít right there with you. Since Iíve been in the United States Senate, Iíve been always a partner with ACORN as well. Iíve been fighting with ACORN, alongside ACORN on issues you care about my entire career.

PAT: On that, that sounds a lot like I worked with them on one issue.

GLENN: Doesnít it?

PAT: Yeah.

GLENN: You donít even have to call me. Iíll call you. Iíll call you. We talked, I think it was last summer I said, warning, ACORN is going to break up and break up into several pieces. Stu, can you give me the names, please, of all of the different pieces that they are breaking up into now? They are broken up now in Massachusetts, they have broken up in California. The next one I understand is supposed to be Texas, but they are breaking up and changing names. This is what progressives always do. They change names. They donít go away.

GLENN: You donít even have to call me. Iíll call you. Iíll call you. We talked, I think it was last summer I said, warning, ACORN is going to break up and break up into several pieces. Stu, can you give me the names, please, of all of the different pieces that they are breaking up into now? They are broken up now in Massachusetts, they have broken up in California. The next one I understand is supposed to be Texas, but they are breaking up and changing names. This is what progressives always do. They change names. They donít go away.

Here are the names and the states that they are changing in.

STU: New York is now changing to New York Communities For Change.

GLENN: Mmm.

STU: Doesnít that just seem so wonderful?

GLENN: Oh, yes.

PAT: I feel like the change word was the theme of somebodyís campaign at some point. Meanwhile the Massachusetts branch of ACORN has been named New England United for Justice.

GLENN: Mmm.

STU: Does that feel good?

PAT: Justice always feels good.

GLENN: Just know in New England United for Justice calls you, itís ACORN. Nothing is changing except the name, and theyíre dismantling their national membership, their national membership. Thatís it.

PAT: But thatís all?

GLENN: But thatís it.

PAT: Okay.

GLENN: But thatís it. So you got that going for you. And youíve got the president of the United States claiming that he knows nothing about it. Thatís clearly untrue. Itís clearly untrue and clearly a blatant lie.

STU: And thereís such an interesting part of the media here where you have and the other one was the California one, by the way, Alliance for Californiaís Community Empowerment. All these names are changing. The national organization of a big news story over the past year is dissolving because of, you know, all of the corruption thatís been inside of it, and you have at the same time, itís from a congressman, right, who uncovered this video, right? Is it Darrell Issa?

GLENN: Yeah, Darrell Issa.

STU: So you have a congressman that uncovers video of a president lying about that story, yet itís still invisible in the media.

GLENN: Now, let me ask you this: How is it possible that this is invisible? How is it possible that this is invisible? Major organization, center of controversy for years dissolving, going away, same time president is exposed as a liar. This is not a small lie. This isnít trivial. This is, I have nothing to do with them, I donít really even know to, "Iím going to call you guys. Iíve been involved with you every step of the way. Every bit of your campaigning in Illinois, Iím with you." How is this not a lead story everywhere in America? When you think that the news is giving you the truth, think again. How is it possible if truth is what youíre really looking for? How is it possible that Van Jones is now going around to schools and talking to schools? Where is that? I thought everybody was upset that he had to be driven out of politics because he was a 9/11 Truther, which was the least of my worries. The guy is a communist revolutionary. He had to be driven out of schools, but now he can go back into schools. He had to be driven out of the White House but now he can stand shoulder to shoulder with Democratic senators. Howís that working? Thereís no intellectual honesty at all in the media. I wonder whatís going to be said now about Nancy Pelosi? We have the statement from Nancy Pelosi. Weíll give that to you in a second. And now we have the correction from Nancy Pelosi. Now we have Nancy Pelosi coming out and saying, oh, well, you know what? Okay, they were lyingÖ but now that there are, thereís actual evidence, now that the CIA has released evidence that she was briefed, what is she going to say now?

To win, Republicans and Tea Partiers have to expose Leftist lies and unite.

The Beckster could have done much more to expose the truth if he had done what Michelle Malkin did--report the story of ACORN whisleblower Anita MonCrief. Americans want to hear from actual witnesses.

Michael J. Gaynor

Send email feedback to Michael J. Gaynor


Biography - Michael J. Gaynor

Michael J. Gaynor has been practicing law in New York since 1973. A former partner at Fulton, Duncombe & Rowe and Gaynor & Bass, he is a solo practitioner admitted to practice in New York state and federal courts and an Association of the Bar of the City of New York member.

Gaynor graduated magna cum laude, with Honors in Social Science, from Hofstra University's New College, and received his J.D. degree from St. John's Law School, where he won the American Jurisprudence Award in Evidence and served as an editor of the Law Review and the St. Thomas More Institute for Legal Research. He wrote on the Pentagon Papers case for the Review and obscenity law for The Catholic Lawyer and edited the Law Review's commentary on significant developments in New York law.

The day after graduating, Gaynor joined the Fulton firm, where he focused on litigation and corporate law. In 1997 Gaynor and Emily Bass formed Gaynor & Bass and then conducted a general legal practice, emphasizing litigation, and represented corporations, individuals and a New York City labor union. Notably, Gaynor & Bass prevailed in the Second Circuit in a seminal copyright infringement case, Tasini v. New York Times, against newspaper and magazine publishers and Lexis-Nexis. The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed, 7 to 2, holding that the copyrights of freelance writers had been infringed when their work was put online without permission or compensation.

Gaynor currently contributes regularly to www.MichNews.com, www.RenewAmerica.com, www.WebCommentary.com, www.PostChronicle.com and www.therealitycheck.org and has contributed to many other websites. He has written extensively on political and religious issues, notably the Terry Schiavo case, the Duke "no rape" case, ACORN and canon law, and appeared as a guest on television and radio. He was acknowledged in Until Proven Innocent, by Stuart Taylor and KC Johnson, and Culture of Corruption, by Michelle Malkin. He appeared on "Your World With Cavuto" to promote an eBay boycott that he initiated and "The World Over With Raymond Arroyo" (EWTN) to discuss the legal implications of the Schiavo case. On October 22, 2008, Gaynor was the first to report that The New York Times had killed an Obama/ACORN expose on which a Times reporter had been working with ACORN whistleblower Anita MonCrief.

Gaynor's email address is gaynormike@aol.com.


Read other commentaries by Michael J. Gaynor.

Copyright © 2011 by Michael J. Gaynor
All Rights Reserved.

[ Back ]


© 2004-2017 by WEBCommentary(tm), All Rights Reserved