The upcoming presidential election is much too important for us to indulge McCain.
Election Day 2008 is three weeks away.
Then America's voters will have their say.
Polls show Obama ahead.
Is McCain finally "dead"?
McCain's a proud man and war hero who wants to win in a certain way.
But, the whole truth about Obama must be told, or Obama will carry the day.
McCain's saying Obama is fit to be President, but McCain himself is the better choice.
Each time McCain does that, Team Obama and the fawning folks at MSNBC rejoice.
For McCain, that's a guaranteed losing strategy.
And McCain losing would be a national tragedy.
The upcoming presidential election is much too important for us to indulge McCain.
For America's and posterity's sake, the election has to be won FOR him, to put it plain.
Fortunately, the First Amendment protects freedom of speech and press.
And there's still enough time to bring for us to fix the current political mess.
Fortunately, McCain is wrong about Obama: The American people should be afraid of an Obama presidency.
And when the whole truth about Obama becomes know, "that one" won't be taking up White House residency.
Wendy E. Long, Judicial Confirmation Network counsel:
"...Messrs. McCain or Obama could have a tremendous impact on the Court well into this century with evenone nomination. At this point, one more liberal justice could provide a fifth vote to invent a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, for example. Messrs. McCain and Obama have told us what we can expect from their Supreme Court appointments. Mr. Obama says he would appoint justices like Ginsburg, Breyer, and Souter - the liberal activist anchors of the current Court. He says his criterion for selecting justices is whether they have 'heart' and 'empathy - exactly the opposite of the dispassionate model of justice our Constitution requires. Mr. McCain says his criteria are 'judicial ability,' 'experience,' 'humility,' and 'impartiality.' He has promised to nominate jurists like Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito.
"That is a world of difference. Voters don't get to choose Supreme Court justices. The time for their choosing is now, as they elect a president whose judgment and criteria will be brought to bear on that task."
Mrs. Long is right as rain.
Voting for Obama is insane.
If you want a United States Supreme Court that will strike "under God" from "The Pledge of Allegiance," Obama is your candidate.
Believers in traditional American values rightly fear what would happen to America after the election of Michelle Obama's mate.
Michelle who said America was a "mean" country.
There's just no justification for such affrontery.
Obama's unfit to be President (and not just because he would appoint judicial activists instead of persons who would uphold the Constitution as judges should do).
An Obama presidency would bring socialist change that all but the Far Left secular extremists had very good reason to rue.
Obama, candidate of change and hope?
BAD change! Don't be a dope.
Obama's more radical than the People's Republic of Vermont's acknowledged Socialist Senator Bernie Sanders.
To those who want wealth redistribution and the actual taxpayers to pay their bills, Obama shamelessly panders.
But if you think Americans "cling" to God and guns because they're bitter about their life.
Then, for you and your ilk, for President, it's Obama, and for First Lady, it's his wife.
Obama's a presidential nominee thanks to liberal media bias and lack of scutiny.
And he's been lying about his relationships with Ayers and ACORN with impunity.
Thanks be to God,.Obama et al. are soon in for a big October surprise.
That will expose those covered up connections and contemptible lies.
Michael J. Gaynor has been practicing law in New York since 1973. A former partner at Fulton, Duncombe & Rowe and Gaynor & Bass, he is a solo practitioner admitted to practice in New York state and federal courts and an Association of the Bar of the City of New York member.
Gaynor graduated magna cum laude, with Honors in Social Science, from Hofstra University's New College, and received his J.D. degree from St. John's Law School, where he won the American Jurisprudence Award in Evidence and served as an editor of the Law Review and the St. Thomas More Institute for Legal Research. He wrote on the Pentagon Papers case for the Review and obscenity law for The Catholic Lawyer and edited the Law Review's commentary on significant developments in New York law.
The day after graduating, Gaynor joined the Fulton firm, where he focused on litigation and corporate law. In 1997 Gaynor and Emily Bass formed Gaynor & Bass and then conducted a general legal practice, emphasizing litigation, and represented corporations, individuals and a New York City labor union. Notably, Gaynor & Bass prevailed in the Second Circuit in a seminal copyright infringement case, Tasini v. New York Times, against newspaper and magazine publishers and Lexis-Nexis. The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed, 7 to 2, holding that the copyrights of freelance writers had been infringed when their work was put online without permission or compensation.
Gaynor currently contributes regularly to www.MichNews.com, www.RenewAmerica.com, www.WebCommentary.com, www.PostChronicle.com and www.therealitycheck.org and has contributed to many other websites. He has written extensively on political and religious issues, notably the Terry Schiavo case, the Duke "no rape" case, ACORN and canon law, and appeared as a guest on television and radio. He was acknowledged in Until Proven Innocent, by Stuart Taylor and KC Johnson, and Culture of Corruption, by Michelle Malkin. He appeared on "Your World With Cavuto" to promote an eBay boycott that he initiated and "The World Over With Raymond Arroyo" (EWTN) to discuss the legal implications of the Schiavo case. On October 22, 2008, Gaynor was the first to report that The New York Times had killed an Obama/ACORN expose on which a Times reporter had been working with ACORN whistleblower Anita MonCrief.
Cover
•
Commentary
•
Books & Reviews
•
Climate Change
•
Site Links
•
Feedback
