Ironically, Breitbart is the best hope for Obama and the Far Left, because Obama's only path to re-election requires his opposition to split and Breitbart, who describes himself as "a recovering Republican," literally tells Americans who say that they agree with Tea Party principles to "go to hell."
At JasonWHoyt.com (www.jasonwhoyt.com/2011/10/05/breakfast-with-anita-moncrief-brandon-darby-andrew-breitbart-presented-by-afp-florida-suite-tea/, videos of Anita MonCrief, Brandon Darby & Andrew Breitbart speaking at a breakfast sponsored by Americans For Prosperity - Florida and the Tea Party Movement of Florida on September 23, 2011 are posted.
These videos show why it is critical that President Obama be defeated in 2012...and why that might not happen.
Watch them.
MonCrief and Darby are ex-radicals who tell us as only insiders can what the Far Left was up to an how dangerous it is. Every American needs to know their stories.
Breitbart is an Alinskyite who switched sides and uses Alinsky's "principles" against the Far Left now. He lauds MonCrief and Darby for their enlightenment and explains how his own views changed since he was a child of privilege and an American Studies student under Marxists at Tulane into drugs, alcohol and "fun".
BUT, ironically, Breitbart is the best hope for Obama and the Far Left, because Obama's only path to re-election requires his opposition to split and Breitbart, who describes himself as "a recovering Republican," literally tells Americans who say that they agree with Tea Party principles to "go to hell."
Since his election, Obamacare has been working assiduously on "fundamentally transforming" America. A stealth socialist who loathes being identified as a socialist, he's done his best (or worst) to deliver what the socialists want--Obamacare, wasteful and ineffective stimulus and job-killing regulation exemplified by Dodd-Frank and the liberal media establishment that got him elected in 2008 continue to protect and promote him.
Breitbart unhelpfully blames the Republican establishment, but the Republican establishment did not control the liberal media establishment, there are fundamental differences between the Republican and Democrat parties, the two-party system is America's political system and the Republican Party does a much better job of promoting the traditional American values of "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."
Obama's blatant and provable lies about his relationship with ACORN could and should have been his undoing in 2008. MonCrief had the evidence, but The New York Times, ABC and CNN did not deem it "fit to print" (or broadcast) and MonCrief was hopefully supporting Obama, anticipating "good" change, and leery of Fox News.
MonCrief and Darby learned that their hopeful idealism had been misplaced and have been, in Hoyt's words, "on a journey to seek truth and to simply do the right thing" and "not many have been willing to journey as far with as much courage as these great Patriots."
The key to victory for traditional American values is spreading the ugly truth about the Far Left that MonCrief and Darby now appreciate...and opponents of Obama and his stealth socialist uniting instead of dividing.
If Obama gets "four more years" to pursue his plan to "fundamentally transform" America and the number of Americans who are poor and benefiting from income tax without paying any continues to increase, the damage may be irreversible and a big government-dependent majority may maintain the Far Left in power in perpetuity.
Michael J. Gaynor has been practicing law in New York since 1973. A former partner at Fulton, Duncombe & Rowe and Gaynor & Bass, he is a solo practitioner admitted to practice in New York state and federal courts and an Association of the Bar of the City of New York member.
Gaynor graduated magna cum laude, with Honors in Social Science, from Hofstra University's New College, and received his J.D. degree from St. John's Law School, where he won the American Jurisprudence Award in Evidence and served as an editor of the Law Review and the St. Thomas More Institute for Legal Research. He wrote on the Pentagon Papers case for the Review and obscenity law for The Catholic Lawyer and edited the Law Review's commentary on significant developments in New York law.
The day after graduating, Gaynor joined the Fulton firm, where he focused on litigation and corporate law. In 1997 Gaynor and Emily Bass formed Gaynor & Bass and then conducted a general legal practice, emphasizing litigation, and represented corporations, individuals and a New York City labor union. Notably, Gaynor & Bass prevailed in the Second Circuit in a seminal copyright infringement case, Tasini v. New York Times, against newspaper and magazine publishers and Lexis-Nexis. The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed, 7 to 2, holding that the copyrights of freelance writers had been infringed when their work was put online without permission or compensation.
Gaynor currently contributes regularly to www.MichNews.com, www.RenewAmerica.com, www.WebCommentary.com, www.PostChronicle.com and www.therealitycheck.org and has contributed to many other websites. He has written extensively on political and religious issues, notably the Terry Schiavo case, the Duke "no rape" case, ACORN and canon law, and appeared as a guest on television and radio. He was acknowledged in Until Proven Innocent, by Stuart Taylor and KC Johnson, and Culture of Corruption, by Michelle Malkin. He appeared on "Your World With Cavuto" to promote an eBay boycott that he initiated and "The World Over With Raymond Arroyo" (EWTN) to discuss the legal implications of the Schiavo case. On October 22, 2008, Gaynor was the first to report that The New York Times had killed an Obama/ACORN expose on which a Times reporter had been working with ACORN whistleblower Anita MonCrief.
Cover
•
Commentary
•
Books & Reviews
•
Climate Change
•
Site Links
•
Feedback
