WEBCommentary Editor

Author: Bob Webster
Date:  August 8, 2019

Topic category:  Partisan Politics

Who is really behind sowing the seeds of division in the USA?


Democrats and their friends in the news media claim President Trump is divisive and his rhetoric is responsible for mass killings like the one in El Paso, TX. Are they right?

Whose rhetoric is really fueling discord and division? President Donald J. Trump? Or is the rhetoric of Democrat candidates and their media water-carriers far worse than anything President Trump has actually said (most of his claimed “hate speech” is in the mind of the claimants)?

According to the Cambridge Dictionary:

invasion (noun:  an occasion when a large number of people or things come to a place in an annoying and unwanted way:  the annual invasion of foreign tourists

An illegal alien is anyone who enters a nation illegally, either using forged documents at an official border entry point or entering illegally at any point other than an official border entry point. The use of euphemisms such as “undocumented immigrant” by politicians and their news media water-carriers to describe an illegal alien is a tactic commonly used by charlatans who want to muddy the waters by creating a false impression that such persons are not acting illegally. Charlatan politicians evidently believe most people are just too simple-minded to see through their word games.

When President Trump talks of an “invasion” of illegal aliens across our southern border, he is referring to aliens crossing our southern border en masse at any place not specifically designated for legal crossings. He is not engaging in “inflammatory rhetoric” or “racist” rhetoric or “xenophobic” rhetoric. He is speaking the plain truth. His is not engaging in “anti-immigrant hate speech” as falsely claimed by his adversaries.

But that plain truth is inconvenient and uncomfortable for Democrat politicians who created the border crisis decades ago and who stubbornly refuse to lift a finger to fix it. Why? Because its intended purpose is to increase the Democratic Party’s political power by restocking inner city “voter plantations” being abandoned by American Blacks as they move up the economic ladder and realize they've been used by the Democratic Party since LBJ's "War on Poverty" designed to concentrate Black Americans in urban areas controlled by Democrats, keep them in poverty, assure they had a poor education, and tell them they were victims of Republicans so that they could bus them to polling places each election and have them reliably vote Democrat.

The annual invasion of illegal aliens into the USA is costing American taxpayers dearly.

If you want to hear “hate speech” then just recall some of the hateful speech of Democrat presidential candidates:

You get the idea. Yet this dishonest Democrat name-calling is not considered divisive even when it is patent nonsense that cannot be rationally supported with any evidence, despite the best attempts by the hair-on-fire lunatics on the Left.

In order to make these absurd statements, these candidates and their news media water-carriers adopt a classic tactic of the Left. They take something Trump has said, deliberately mischaracterize it, and then attack their own mischaracterization.

A good example is how Democrats and the news media treated President Trump’s statement on the Charlottsville clash in August 2017.

This kind of childish name-calling behavior has been characteristic of the fake news media and Democrat partisans since election night in 2016. And it is getting way beyond tiresome.

So who is really fanning the flames and sowing the seeds of division in this country?

President Trump?

Or those who haven’t the maturity to put the interests of the USA above their own partisan anger and accept President Trump’s election with grace and dignity?

Bob Webster
WEBCommentary (Editor, Publisher)


Biography - Bob Webster

Bob Webster, a descendant of Daniel Webster's father, Revolutionary War patriot Ebenezer Webster, has always had a strong interest in early American history, our Constitution, U.S. politics, and law. Politically he is a constitutional republican with objectivist and libertarian roots. He has faith in the ultimate triumph of truth and reason over deception and emotion. He is a strong believer in our Constitution as written and views the abandonment of constitutional restraint by the regressive Progressive movement as a great danger to our Republic. His favorite novel is Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand and believes it should be required reading for all high school students so they can appreciate the cost of tolerating the growth of unconstitutional crushingly powerful central government. He strongly believes, as our Constitution enshrines, that the interests of the individual should be held superior to the interests of the state.

A lifelong interest in meteorology and climatology spurred his strong interest in science. Bob earned his degree in Mathematics at Virginia Tech, graduating in 1964.


Copyright © 2019 by Bob Webster
All Rights Reserved.


© 2004-2019 by WEBCommentary(tm), All Rights Reserved