Topic category: Corruption in Government
One big loser defends another
Apparently, being a Democrat woman and Secretary of State is a disastrous combination
There is strong anecdotal evidence that five people have died as a consequence of Hillary Clinton's deliberate abuses of FOIA and national security law. Four died in Benghazi, one in Afghanistan.
All because as Secretary of State, Clinton wanted to hide her email "conversations" related to her corrupt and illegal trading of government favors for cash infusions into the Clinton's "fund" (a fund whose primary reason to exist is to enrich the Clintons by acting as a repository for graft & corruption payments).
Strong anecdotal evidence suggests highly classified documents revealing the poor security at Benghazi passed through Clinton's easily hacked server. Shortly thereafter, terrorists attacked the Benghazi compound, killing four Americans including the Ambassador.
Another highly classified document containing the name of a secret CIA contact within the Afghan government is said to have also passed through Clinton's server. Two weeks after that claimed breach of highly sensitive information, that CIA asset was assassinated.
Hillary Clinton campaigns for the highest office in this nation all the while merrily lying through her teeth about these incidents. Clinton is careful to avoid any press conferences where she cannot tightly control content and questions asked.
She claims she has had hundreds of interviews. We know how such interviews go when Clinton is the subject. Everything is carefully scripted and the end product controlled.
Can you imagine if Hillary Clinton held a REAL press conference, where all members of the press were allowed to freely ask questions?
So, no, Madeline, people have ALREADY died.
And the biggest crime in all of this is the terrible danger Clinton's actions create for our nation.
What foreign country is going to share critical information with us (information that could expose their own agents) when we cannot protect highly classified information even at cabinet level positions?
That a self-serving shrew should be allowed to violate the highest levels of national security with such regularity for so long (this went on for several years) and is free to campaign for her party's nomination is a damning statement about the current Administration, our national culture, the Democratic Party, and all those who facilitate this egregious breach of laws not only covering national security, but the public's right to know (FOIA laws) as well as anti-corruption laws.
Other nations easily see how Clinton gets away with murder and is given a pass by numbskulls for only three reasons: (1) she is a woman (though not a very charitable example), (2) she is a Democrat (and Democrats can do no wrong), and (3) she will do whatever is needed to advance the Progressive agenda (so long as it further enriches her personal assets).
If our leaders do not stop this travesty in its tracks and bring justice to the victims of Clinton's hubris, the people of this nation will get exactly what they deserve... and it will not be pretty.
While Albright is merely a doddering fool, Clinton is a self-absorbed embarrasment of monumental proportions.
The dismissal by the "usual suspects" in our news media ("nothing here, folks, move along") of Clinton's clear corruption, and FOIA and national security breaches, is breathtaking for its callous disregard for the damage it does to our nation, including our national integrity and honor.
Evidently, integrity and honor are "situational" to these Progressive loonies who blindly support the corrupt Clintons. If something advances the Progressive agenda, then it must be ethical and honorable, right?
Our nation is in grave peril from within... and the soldiers and agents of our collapse are the PC crowd who tolerate everything and who advocate only for those things that advance the Progressive cause.
Truth, integrity, and honor are casualties of backward Progressive thinking and are, therefore, irrelevant to these soldiers. In Progressives' amoral code, such traits as truth, integrity, and honor can be rightfully dismissed with their "end justifies the means" approach to everything.
And Progressives' "end" is just as heinous as their "means".
Those "usual suspects" in news media are the high-ranking officers in this army of Progressive loonies that Trump has so aptly characterized.
Looking into a crystal ball, wouldn't it be fitting if we saw that in 2017 Madeline Albright is in an asylum, Hillary Clinton is in an orange jumpsuit (writing her memoirs, "Color me Orange") while serving a life sentence in a federal penitentiary, and Donald Trump is holding a cabinet meeting in the White House?
WEBCommentary (Editor, Publisher)
Biography - Bob Webster
Bob Webster, a 12th-generation descendent of both the Darte family (Connecticut, 1630s) and the Webster family (Massachusetts, 1630s) is a descendant of Daniel Webster's father, Revolutionary War patriot Ebenezer Webster, who served with General Washington. Bob has always had a strong interest in early American history, our Constitution, U.S. politics, and law. Politically he is a constitutional republican with objectivist and libertarian roots. He has faith in the ultimate triumph of truth and reason over deception and emotion. He is a strong believer in our Constitution as written and views the abandonment of constitutional restraint by the regressive Progressive movement as a great danger to our Republic. His favorite novel is Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand and believes it should be required reading for all high school students so they can appreciate the cost of tolerating the growth of unconstitutional crushingly powerful central government. He strongly believes, as our Constitution enshrines, that the interests of the individual should be held superior to the interests of the state.
A lifelong interest in meteorology and climatology spurred his strong interest in science. Bob earned his degree in Mathematics at Virginia Tech, graduating in 1964.